<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tagline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tagliners.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tagliners.org</link>
	<description>a movie podcast</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Show #20 - Summer 2007 is over. Bring on 2008!! by Fajar</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2007/07/show-20-summer-2007-is-over-bring-on-2008/#comment-10475</link>
		<dc:creator>Fajar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1499147263#comment-10475</guid>
		<description>Yeah i think not many movies in last summer is very good, at least there's a good movies in summer.
Talk about ocean 13, that's right, that movie isn't coz they plan is soo perfect, there's nothing surprises act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah i think not many movies in last summer is very good, at least there&#8217;s a good movies in summer.<br />
Talk about ocean 13, that&#8217;s right, that movie isn&#8217;t coz they plan is soo perfect, there&#8217;s nothing surprises act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Show #10 - Oscar nominations&#8230; and our winning picks by It&#8217;s Oscar night! at Tagline</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2007/01/show-10-oscar-nominations-and-our-winning-picks/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Oscar night! at Tagline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tagliners.org/?p=25#comment-372</guid>
		<description>[...] In the meantime, just to give you a scorecard to compare us against overnight&#8230; here to recap are our Oscar picks. Of course, if you want to hear the reasoning behind all this you still have time to go listen to Show #10, with our Oscar noms explained. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the meantime, just to give you a scorecard to compare us against overnight&#8230; here to recap are our Oscar picks. Of course, if you want to hear the reasoning behind all this you still have time to go listen to Show #10, with our Oscar noms explained. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Show #10 - Oscar nominations&#8230; and our winning picks by Al</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2007/01/show-10-oscar-nominations-and-our-winning-picks/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tagliners.org/?p=25#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Departed? Not. A. Chance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Departed? Not. A. Chance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Show #10 - Oscar nominations&#8230; and our winning picks by benj</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2007/01/show-10-oscar-nominations-and-our-winning-picks/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>benj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tagliners.org/?p=25#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I think the oscars voters pick stuff either out of sentimentality or because they want people to think they're cultured. On that basis I bet The Departed is going to win and Scorcese as well. And I reckon Eddie Murphy will get one too. And Mirren and Wwitaker will win easily because the oscars people want people to think they are interested in world politics as well as hollywood politics. Haven't seen any of the movies though they all look a bit shit to me. For the other category I reckon Hudson because she's probably quite good in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the oscars voters pick stuff either out of sentimentality or because they want people to think they&#8217;re cultured. On that basis I bet The Departed is going to win and Scorcese as well. And I reckon Eddie Murphy will get one too. And Mirren and Wwitaker will win easily because the oscars people want people to think they are interested in world politics as well as hollywood politics. Haven&#8217;t seen any of the movies though they all look a bit shit to me. For the other category I reckon Hudson because she&#8217;s probably quite good in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Show #4 - The Big 2007 Movie Preview at Tagline</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/about/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Show #4 - The Big 2007 Movie Preview at Tagline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">252803482#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] About [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on And, we&#8217;re back. by Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2006/11/and-were-back/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tagliners.org/?p=7#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Good to have you guys back again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to have you guys back again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on And, we&#8217;re back. by Bond. James Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2006/11/and-were-back/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Bond. James Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tagliners.org/?p=7#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Buy Omega.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy Omega.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on And, we&#8217;re back. by Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2006/11/and-were-back/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tagliners.org/?p=7#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Happy to be back, Benj! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy to be back, Benj! <img src='http://www.tagliners.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on And, we&#8217;re back. by benj</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2006/11/and-were-back/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>benj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tagliners.org/?p=7#comment-5</guid>
		<description>dudes - i'm so happy you're back - and to be your first comment... are you going to resurrect the quote quiz - hmmm?

i always believed that sequels could be as good and better than the originals - godfather, star wars V, bttf2?, weekend at bernies 2...

looking forward to many commutes with al and steve humming in me ears...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dudes - i&#8217;m so happy you&#8217;re back - and to be your first comment&#8230; are you going to resurrect the quote quiz - hmmm?</p>
<p>i always believed that sequels could be as good and better than the originals - godfather, star wars V, bttf2?, weekend at bernies 2&#8230;</p>
<p>looking forward to many commutes with al and steve humming in me ears&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
