<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Show #10 - Oscar nominations&#8230; and our winning picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tagliners.org/2007/01/show-10-oscar-nominations-and-our-winning-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2007/01/show-10-oscar-nominations-and-our-winning-picks/</link>
	<description>a movie podcast</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Oscar night! at Tagline</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2007/01/show-10-oscar-nominations-and-our-winning-picks/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Oscar night! at Tagline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tagliners.org/?p=25#comment-372</guid>
		<description>[...] In the meantime, just to give you a scorecard to compare us against overnight&#8230; here to recap are our Oscar picks. Of course, if you want to hear the reasoning behind all this you still have time to go listen to Show #10, with our Oscar noms explained. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the meantime, just to give you a scorecard to compare us against overnight&#8230; here to recap are our Oscar picks. Of course, if you want to hear the reasoning behind all this you still have time to go listen to Show #10, with our Oscar noms explained. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2007/01/show-10-oscar-nominations-and-our-winning-picks/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tagliners.org/?p=25#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Departed? Not. A. Chance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Departed? Not. A. Chance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benj</title>
		<link>http://www.tagliners.org/2007/01/show-10-oscar-nominations-and-our-winning-picks/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>benj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tagliners.org/?p=25#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I think the oscars voters pick stuff either out of sentimentality or because they want people to think they're cultured. On that basis I bet The Departed is going to win and Scorcese as well. And I reckon Eddie Murphy will get one too. And Mirren and Wwitaker will win easily because the oscars people want people to think they are interested in world politics as well as hollywood politics. Haven't seen any of the movies though they all look a bit shit to me. For the other category I reckon Hudson because she's probably quite good in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the oscars voters pick stuff either out of sentimentality or because they want people to think they&#8217;re cultured. On that basis I bet The Departed is going to win and Scorcese as well. And I reckon Eddie Murphy will get one too. And Mirren and Wwitaker will win easily because the oscars people want people to think they are interested in world politics as well as hollywood politics. Haven&#8217;t seen any of the movies though they all look a bit shit to me. For the other category I reckon Hudson because she&#8217;s probably quite good in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
